The Supreme Court on Thursday was divided over whether a federal judge has the power to block President Donald Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship while the case moves through […] ...

The Supreme Court seems intent on keeping a block on President Donald Trump’s restrictions on birthright citizenship while looking for a way to scale back nationwide court orders.

Birthright citizenship has been ingrained in the constitution for over 150 years. But an executive order seeks to end it.

While there is no serious argument that Trump’s birthright citizenship order is legal, there are very serious arguments on both sides of the nationwide injunction question. Gorsuch and Prelogar are ...

"The loss of birthright citizenship ... in showing that the Executive Order is either constitutional or compliant with” federal law, Barron wrote. The three-judge panel in the 4th U.S ...

The Trump administration is asking the Supreme Court to allow restrictions on birthright citizenship ... A federal judge on Thursday blocked President Donald Trump’s executive order to ...

On May 15, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the federal government’s efforts to be able to generally implement ...

Supreme Court set to hear arguments in high-stakes case over two areas of law: birthright citizenship and nationwide ...

The Trump Administration is trying to use the case to stop lower-court judges from issuing “nationwide injunctions” against ...

The central dispute yesterday morning was not about the birthright-citizenship order itself. Instead, it was about the relief ...

"The loss of birthright citizenship — even if temporary ... to succeed on appeal in showing that the Executive Order is either constitutional or compliant with” federal law, Barron wrote. The ...

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments Thursday on former President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship. The order, which would deny citizenship to children ...