This was a very small study, with only 48 volunteers who each looked at 24 pieces of art, so it shouldn't be taken to have huge implications for how people see any form of computer-generated art ...

Computer Art With a Human Touch An exhibition of early computer art shows that artists working with early-stage technologies make their best work by combining old and new techniques. by Justin ...

Wallpaper started gaining design momentum a few years ago, and now it's everywhere you look: dens, cafes, nurseries, bakeries, restaurants, powder rooms and wine bars. Publications as diverse as ...

On Tuesday, Meta revealed that it has developed an AI image generation engine, dubbed "Make-A-Scene", that it hopes will lead to immersive worlds in the Metaverse and the emergence of digital high ...

Generative Art Is Challenging What It Means to Be Human In the age of NFTs, artists who collaborate with machines are forcing new questions around intellectual property, process, and the value of art.

Vera Molnar, Pioneer of Computer Art, Dies at 99 Experimenting with algorithms, she began to employ the principles of computation in her work even before she gained access to an actual computer.

Sacred art is a human endeavor, ... Thus, a computer-generated image cannot match a human artist. Nor can AI religious pictures inspire like a painting by Raphael or Fra Angelico.

A work of art created by artificial intelligence without any human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law, a U.S. court in Washington, D.C., has ruled.

Computer scientist Stephen Thaler on Tuesday asked a Washington, D.C., federal court to rule that his artificial intelligence system is entitled to copyrights for art it created.