The Black Swan operation uncovered a $500 million treasure from a sunken Spanish galleon, sparking a legal battle over ownership and hidden riches.

Images have been released of the interior of the superyacht Bayesian, showing the wreckage filled with mud and scattered furniture.

In upholding a Texas law requiring age verification to access porn websites, the court overturned a precedent that stood for more than two decades.

How the court reaffirmed the proper role of the federal courts within our constitutional system.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court ruled on Friday that Maryland parents who have religious objections can pull their children from public school lessons using LGBTQ storybooks.

For most citizens, the release of Supreme Court opinions is about as exciting as watching paint dry, particularly in a case dealing with the limits of district courts in issuing universal injunctio… ...

Can Democrats Still Fight Trump In Court? What Supreme Court’s Birthright Citizenship Ruling Means For President’s Agenda By Alison Durkee, Forbes Staff.

The ruling said parents could choose to have their children temporarily removed from classes with lessons and books that offend their religous beliefs. The court’s three liberals dissented.

Within hours of the ruling, which curbs nationwide injunctions, challengers filed new court papers seeking to block Trump's plan via a different legal avenue.

The Supreme Court just made it harder for judges to block presidential policies nationwide, but lawmakers hold the key to changing that.

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Maryland parents who objected on religious grounds to the use of books with LGBTQ characters in elementary school.

The Supreme Court's restriction on nationwide injunctions is a radical limit on the power of the federal courts. Nothing in any federal law or the Constitution justifies it.