Though Intel does promise to keep the generation of a chip noted in the codename, i.e. 'Core 9 15900K'. This might help prevent confusion with what's currently a bit of an issue in Intel's multi ...

Find out more about how we evaluate games and hardware. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285, the current flagship CPU showcasing Intel's new Arrow Lake architecture marks the entry of a brave new world for ...

v=9EHa7gkCgHY Here, let’s dig into the top ten things you should know about Intel’s Core Ultra 200S CPUs, after extensive testing of the flagship Core Ultra 9 285K. Last year, Intel retooled ...

In addition, Intel doesn’t support hyperthreading on its E-cores. Because of that setup, the Core i9-14900K has more cores than the Ryzen 9 9950X, but both CPUs offer the same number of threads.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H I had an opportunity to test is powerful and efficient, with a surprisingly capable integrated GPU. However, no laptop running these new chips will be Copilot+ PCs ...

and the performance I saw in our Ryzen 9 9950X3D review is proof of that. Intel's fastest consumer CPU, the Core Ultra 9 285K, puts up some decent results by comparison, but it's held back by ...

This is a pretty big scalp for Intel - beating the Ryzen 9 7950X in Cinebench's multi-threaded test. What's also impressive is the massive increase over the Core i9-12900K - from 27,579 to 40,444 ...

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K at Amazon for $557.52 So, if the Core Ultra 9 285K is launching alongside the Ultra 5 245K at the same MSRP as its intended replacement with much-needed power efficiency ...

For as long as I can remember, I've had love of all things tech, spurred on, in part, by a love of gaming. I began working on computers owned by immediate family members and relatives when I was ...

Despite its different name, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is essentially the Core i9-15900K, just with a much smaller number as its namesake. Intel effectively rebranded its Core series of ...

However, the new Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and Intel Core Ultra 5 245K really aren't any better than the chips they are replacing, and their efficiency gains are too modest to justify investing in a ...