As a part of Vinson & Elkins’ Texas Business Court Quarterly Update, the following update summarizes the Texas Business Court opinions—categorized by primary issue—that have been released ...

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Friday upheld a Texas law aimed at blocking children from seeing online pornography. Nearly half of the states have passed similar laws requiring adult ...

The Supreme Court has upheld a Texas law aimed at blocking kids from seeing pornography online. The high court handed down the ruling Friday.

The Supreme Court upheld a Texas law Friday that requires adult websites to verify the age of their users, concluding that the policy does not violate the First Amendment.

Supreme Court rules Texas can require age verification on pornography websites, allowing penalties up to $250,000 if minors access explicit content due to non-compliance.

In a 6–3 decision split along ideological lines, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a Texas law requiring age verification for online access to pornographic material. The law is one of many across ...

Topline The Supreme Court upheld Friday Texas’ age verification law for pornography and adult websites, a blow to civil rights advocates who argue the law infringes on Americans' privacy rights ...

The Supreme Court has upheld Texas's age-verification law for porn websites, ruling along ideological lines that it does not violate the First Amendment.

Washington — The Supreme Court on Friday upheld a Texas law that requires pornography websites to verify their visitors' age, finding that the lower court applied the appropriate level of ...

The Supreme Court last year allowed Texas to continue enforcing the age-verification measure while it weighed the case, known as Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton.

Porn age-gating is the future of the internet, thanks to the Supreme Court A Texas law requiring age verification for adult websites doesn’t violate the First Amendment, the court says.

The Supreme Court on Friday upheld a Texas law that requires age verification for pornographic websites in one of the most closely watched First Amendment cases to arrive at the high court in years.