AMD and Intel use slightly different numbers for power, but the Core i9-14900K still sucks down more watts. The Ryzen 9 9950X tops out at 170 watts, while the Core i9-14900K can climb up to 253W.

Intel may not have improved gaming performance on the Core Ultra 9 285K, but its goal was to improve efficiency. And true to its word, there are some big improvements in temperature and power draw.

I said in my AMD Ryzen 9 7900X review last month that 2022’s Intel versus AMD CPU battle had only just begun. And now, less than a month later, Intel is back on top. While AMD’s Zen 4 ...

And Zen 4, for that matter. The Core Ultra 9 285K was tested using Intel's recommended Performance power profile of 250 W for PL1 and PL2, and an Icc max value of 347 A.

I’ve been testing Intel’s $589 next-generation flagship Core Ultra 9 285K processor over the past week. It runs cooler and a little faster than Intel’s Core i9-14900K in non-gaming tasks ...

Intel and MSI sent me one of the first laptops to rock the new Intel Core Ultra 9 285H to try it out. After all my testing, I'm confident that few are going to be disappointed by the new H and HX ...

It's not a clean sweep for Intel, with AMD's Ryzen 7950X getting the better of it in a couple of tests an also offering far superior power efficiency. However, there's no denying the Core i9 ...

Today, Intel is releasing its 11th Gen Rocket Lake CPUs and PC enthusiasts will be particularly keen on the Core i9-11900K, Core i7-11700K and Core i5-11600K and how they stack up against AMD's ...

MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo (B2HMG): Specs and features Display: 16-inch 3840×2400 OLED @60Hz Processor: “Up to” Core 7 200H, Core 9 285H as tested Graphics: Intel Arc 140T NPU: Yes, 13 TOPS ...