A year-long evaluation says ChatGPT can do a decent job of summarizing science research papers, but it is prone to hyping, misses nuances, and that it could ultimately break trust.

Republicans have historically funded a lot of science, new research shows. President Trump might be bucking that trend.

What do you do with a weed that grows back in 14 days and kills everything in its path? In Trichy, 25-year-old ecologist ...

When do people behave badly? Extensive research in behavioral science has shown that people are more likely to act ...

As artificial intelligence programs and chatbots increase in popularity, the OU community considers the impacts of AI in the ...

Polarization is eroding trust in science, universities and experts. What does that mean for the future of democracy?

William Liang was sitting in chemistry class one day last spring, listening to a teacher deliver a lecture on “responsible AI ...

The African Youth possess immense creativity and inventiveness but usually struggle to find expression at the highest levels ...

Researchers have analysed how extremist groups use Steam to garner support. Aside from dog whistles to find sympathisers, ...

Researchers Vikash Kumar and Sarthak Mittal argued that understanding sensory discomfort in everyday environments could lead ...

Using MRI scans, researchers found that participants’ patterns of brain activity were alike when looking at certain colors.