"This new Copyright Public Record System allows us to be more flexible in the information that we display and make searchable ...

Assistive uses of AI — Works that are produced through the assistance of AI tools may be protected by copyright so long as the result involves sufficient human creativity (note: AI prompts, by ...

Access to diverse materials for Large Language Models (LLMs, AI) raises legal questions on fair use and copyright ...

We’re pretty sure we understand how copyright works. And we’re here to warn the AI community that it needs to take these lawsuits seriously.

That guidance was included in the second part of a report from the Office on copyright and artificial intelligence. (Part 3, set to be released later this year, will have huge implications for how ...

Under the current copyright registration process, any AI use must be disclaimed for an examination of how the tech was incorporated into the final work and whether it should enjoy protection.

With respect to users of AI systems, it notes that the creation of works using AI requires substantially less time and effort than most human-created works and that humans receive copyright ...

But what we did get a copyright on is the whole of that composition -- the shards of glass, if [they] were melted together by American cheese," said Keirsey in an interview.

Garcia just recognized a compelling shot of Obama and captured a high-quality image. And under US copyright law, that’s enough creativity to merit copyright protection.

A derivative work is itself subject to copyright where it incorporates the existing work and adds new, copyrightable material to it, which is almost always the case.

In my mind, these dim opacities are a profitable tool of Big Tech that works against our interests. As creators, we can’t easily connect with the people who want what we’ve created.