Norm Pattis, of Pattis & Smith, requested the competency hearing in September when Pan was supposed to have his probable cause hearing that later took place in December.

Alex Jones' lawyer Norm Pattis gets a reprieve at CT Appellate Court. Case to continue. Edmund H. Mahony, Hartford Courant Published: May 24, 2024 2:28 AM Updated: Dec 14, 2024 5:14 PM ...

News Appellate Court Vacates Suspension of Alex Jones Lawyer Norm Pattis "I like decisions like this that help us understand how the rules work and what kind of conduct will violate a rule ...

News Appellate Court Vacates Norm Pattis' 6-Month Suspension "I like decisions like this that help us understand how the rules work and what kind of conduct will violate a rule," ethics expert ...

Norm Pattis, founder of Pattis Law Firm. In the past, we have decried Attorney Pattis's offensive behavior. In the recent decision of Lafferty v. Jones, Judge Moll, writing for the Appellate Court ...

"Somewhere, some place, there is a court that will see the case for the farce it became," Norm Pattis of Pattis & Paz, counsel for Jones during the trial, said. "The court of last resort is the ...

Attorney Norm Pattis is arguably Connecticut’s most colorful and controversial lawyer — defender of two of the most despised defendants in recent state history, accused wife murderer Fotis ...

Just why the office of the chief state's attorney is hell-bent on killing people is one of those deeper mysteries I am destined never to understand.

The attorneys, Norm Pattis and Kevin Smith, agreed to the settlement that would also require them to pay the estate $137,000 of a $250,000 retainer Fotis Dulos gave them in January 2020 to defend ...

Jennifer Dulos' late father's estate is suing Fotis Dulos' criminal attorney Norm Pattis over a $250,000 retainer. News 12 Staff • Aug 19, 2020, 10:51 AM • Updated 1,413 days ago Share: ...

FILE – Norm Pattis, attorney for conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, gives his opening statement in Jones’ trial at Waterbury Superior Court, Tuesday morning, Sept. 13, 2022, in Waterbury, Conn ...

However, the court concluded that Pattis only violated RPCs 1.1, 5.1 and 8.4 (4), and vacated the six-month suspension, sending it back for a new hearing on sanctions in front of a different judge.