A behemoth defamation lawsuit brought by the developer of the Dakota Access Pipeline against Greenpeace began its trial in a ...

Dallas-based Energy Transfer and its subsidiary Dakota Access allege trespass, nuisance, defamation and other offenses by ...

Representatives of several tribal nations demonstrate in August 2016 in Bismarck against the Dakota Access Pipeline. (Kyle ...

An attorney for a Texas pipeline company said Wednesday at trial that he will prove various Greenpeace entities coordinated ...

Exterior of the Morton County Courthouse in Mandan on Feb. 27, 2025. (Michael Achterling/North Dakota Monitor)MANDAN, N.D.

N.D. The opening week of the landmark trial of Greenpeace in a multimillion-dollar lawsuit by Energy Transfer over the Dakota Access Pipeline protests did not bode well for the defense.

An attorney for Energy Transfer claimed it was "a day of reckoning," while Greenpeace attorneys said there was no evidence to ...

The organization is asking the North Dakota Supreme Court to move the civil trial brought forth by Energy Transfer to Cass ...

Energy Transfer, which owns the Dakota Access Pipeline, is seeking $300 million, a sum that Greenpeace says could bankrupt the storied environmental group. By Karen Zraick Reporting from the ...

The pipeline was completed in 2017. Energy Transfer and its subsidiary Dakota Access allege trespass, nuisance, defamation and other offenses by Netherlands-based Greenpeace International and its ...

In a North Dakota district court, Texas pipeline ... Greenpeace of single-handedly organizing a disruptive and raucous protest of its most controversial project: the Dakota Access Pipeline.

A coalition of media organizations, including The Bismarck Tribune, petitioned the state Supreme Court Thursday seeking ...