“In consequence, there will be individual patients with SLE who do not fulfill the classification criteria, but still should be diagnosed with SLE to receive proper treatment,” they wrote.

To meet this challenge, several SLE classification criteria have been created that are used as the basis for qualifying individual cases for inclusion into research studies, including ...

Researchers used the 2019 SLE classification criteria from the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) to identify patients with SSc ...

For that reason, multiple classification systems exist today to help researchers and healthcare professionals identify lupus, each using slightly different rules or criteria. Now, new research ...

2025-0390.PV217). "This study showed that participants who ultimately met SLE classification criteria were identified in just over one year—compared to the traditional timeline typically ...

Classification criteria are not the same as diagnostic criteria. Diagnostic criteria are typically a set of symptoms and tests that can be used in everyday clinical practice to make a diagnosis of ...

This is different to tools that help clinicians make a diagnosis. The APS classification criteria were last revised in 2006, but since then understanding of the disease has evolved. EULAR and ACR ...

Of the participants completing the study, 18% were classified as having SLE, 46% as incomplete SLE, and 36% as not showing any indication of SLE. These results demonstrate the potential for digital ...

Findings presented at LUPUS 2025 show virtual SLE Classification Program (PROACTIVE ... that participants who ultimately met SLE classification criteria were identified in just over one ...