News
A judge ruled the Anthropic artificial intelligence company didn't violate copyright laws when it used millions of ...
The recent ruling that okayed Anthropic’s use of ‘stolen books’ to train its AI model shows how copyright law loopholes can ...
U.S. District Judge William Alsup's ruling this week, in a case brought by authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber and Kirk ...
As AI transforms marketing from a storytelling function into a real-time decision system, CMOs must stop managing campaigns ...
Big tech is jumping head-first into new generative AI video programs. Here's what you need to know, including what programs ...
The first two judgements in court cases over the use of books to train artificial intelligence (AI) have been made in the US ...
3don MSN
A California federal judge ruled Anthropic can use copyrighted books to train its Claude AI model without authors' consent ...
Bloomberg on MSN11d
Robot Maker 1X Launches Model to Train Humanoids FasterRobotics firm 1X Technologies launches a new "World Model," which it says is the first data-driven simulator for humanoid ...
Now open source, xbench uses an ever changing evaluation mechanism to look at an AI model's ability to execute real-world ...
Judge William Alsup of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled Monday that Anthropic did not ...
The authors requested a court order blocking Microsoft's infringement and statutory damages of up to $150K for each work ...
4hon MSN
On Wednesday, the judge in the landmark AI copyright case Kadrey, et al. v. Meta Platforms Inc. ruled in Meta’s favor. And U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria seemed to do so reluctantly, calling his ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results