How has the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on the 14th Amendment in the past? An 1898 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Wong Kim Ark is considered the historical standard that children born ...

In May, the Supreme Court will hear on the legality of Trump's executive order to redefine who birthright citizenship applies to.

From the column: "Some quack thought bleeding patients with leeches cured illness. ... A bureaucrat in Washington decided to ...

On his first day in office in January, Trump signed an executive order interpreting the 14th Amendment to mean that only ...

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on May 15 on the federal government’s request to be allowed to implement President ...

Part of the “deep political education” the CPD aims to provide is the history of the 14th Amendment and the indispensable ...

The argument for birthright citizenship hinges on the Citizenship Clause of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment: “All citizens born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the ...

It is the policy of the United States to eliminate the use of disparate-impact liability in all contexts to the maximum ...

The Assembly Judiciary Committee passed Assembly Joint Resolution 5, opposing Trump’s order seeking to reinterpret the 14th ...

The 14th Amendment states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” ...