Interestingly, the District Court spent some time explaining why authorship might be a tricky issue in future cases when there is more human input involved in the AI’s creation, for example ...

Art Institute argues it legally owns watercolor: 'No evidence' it was 'ever physically seized or looted by Nazis’ The Chicago museum, responding to a motion filed by New York prosecutors, says ...

There is no perspective to AI art, no inspiration, nothing it is trying to communicate. It’s a compilation playlist built by an algorithm, spinning an endless number of remixes and cover songs.

DC District Court Judge Beryl A. Howell says human beings are an ‘essential part of a valid copyright claim.’ DC District Court Judge Beryl A. Howell says human beings are an ‘essential part ...

The scary truth about AI copyright is nobody knows what will happen next The last year has seen a boom in AI models that create art, music, and code by learning from others’ work. But as these ...

Thaler claimed the work had been created autonomously by the Creativity Machine with no human involvement. Thaler and his legal team, led by Ryan Abbott, a law professor at the University of Surrey in ...

The copyright office has turned down an work of AI art for the second time. Stephen Thaler has unsuccessfully sought copyright protection for the AI-created A Recent Entrance to Paradise.