“We should be thinking of Rosalind Franklin, not as the victim of DNA, but as an equal contributor and collaborator to the structure,” Dr. Comfort said. Other experts said that the new ...

And is Rosalind Franklin sacrificing what we live and what we experience in order to find that biological matter?” To heighten the choices that Franklin has to make in the musical, Myers turned ...

Rosalind Franklin, a scientist at the University of London, had already documented the helical nature of DNA when Watson and ...

As has been well-documented, a third person contributed to the discovery — the chemist Rosalind Franklin. In January 1953, Franklin was getting ready to leave King’s College. Her colleague ...

Rosalind Franklin’s role in the discovery of the structure of DNA may have been different than previously believed. Franklin wasn’t the victim of data theft at the hands of James Watson and ...

Rosalind Franklin is known for making a significant contribution to the discovery of the DNA double helix. In recent years, her story has become famous as one of a woman whose scientific work was ...

Seventy years on from the discovery of the structure of DNA, controversy still surrounds two central points: how much credit Rosalind Franklin deserved, and the degree to which she was denied it.

Re “Essay Extends Debate Over DNA Discovery” (Science Times, May 2): Determining the role that Rosalind Franklin played in the discovery of the structure of DNA remains a contentious issue.

Regarding “Rosalind Franklin’s Nobel” (Letters, May 5): While James Watson et al. were awarded a 1962 Nobel Prize for the discovery of DNA, key team member Franklin was omitted. While this ...

Rosalind Franklin always liked facts. She was logical and precise, and impatient with things that were otherwise. She decided to become a scientist when she was 15. She passed the examination for ...