But one friend of mine chose “the philosophy of Peter Singer.” At the time ... you were laying out the ideological principles behind the animal welfare movement. Now we’re able to look ...

“Animal Liberation Now,” updating his original to account for the changes in attitudes toward animals over the past half century. I talked to Singer about the new book and how Christian ethics ...

Peter Singer: Animal Liberation was first published in ... my area of interest is ethics, especially practical or applied ethics. That hasn’t changed over the past 50 years.

Australian philosopher Peter Singer, best known for his 1975 book Animal Liberation, spoke to FoodNavigator about ... environmental arguments against meat consumption as separate from ethics.

Senior Lecturer in Digital Ethics, Centre for AI and Digital ... Animal Liberation nearly 50 years ago. Review: Animal Liberation Now – Peter Singer (Penguin Random House) Some features of ...

That gave us an essential common ground from which to discuss ethics, because ... founder of Hong Shih Buddhist College. Peter Singer's Classic 'Animal Liberation' Fully Renewed.

While Singer is best known for his influence on animal rights and effective altruism, his Oxford graduate thesis, later published as his first book, focused on the ethics of civil disobedience in ...

“It’s not about being perfect. It’s about reducing suffering where we can, and right now, we’re choosing not to.” The Long Shadow Of Bill Clinton Over The ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ I ...

Peter Singer, Animal Liberation, 1975 Speciesism is often condemned as the same sort of bigotry as racism or sexism. People who oppose speciesiesm say that giving human beings greater rights than ...

Peter Singer wants us to reconsider ... sound familiar to anyone who has followed Singer’s career, or who has read any of the literature about animal suffering in the massive, mostly indifferent ...

NB: Those working for racial or sexual equality often find this comparison insulting - they say that their struggle for equality has a moral and social importance that animal rights can never have.