The latest federal decision in the relationship between art and artificial intelligence ... into the creation led to the decision that no copyright was available here.

Artificial intelligence-generated works are not eligible for copyright protection, a US federal court ruled on Friday, August 18. Computer scientist Stephen Thaler ...

“No matter how many ... works of human-created art — minus the original human. A separate question is whether text prompts themselves can be protected by copyright. Overall, the office ...

She wrote that this would create “challenging questions regarding how much human input is necessary” to copyright AI-created art, noting that AI models are often trained on pre-existing work.

The post Megadeth Settle Copyright Lawsuit Over Cover Art for Latest Album appeared first on Consequence. Megadeth have settled a copyright lawsuit stemming from the ...

It makes sense to let artists profit from their work through copyright not because there would be no art without the cash incentive, but because money is the imperfect language the law uses to ...

In a big blow to AI artists, the US Copyright Office has released a report stating that visual content created by generative ...

A federal judge on Friday upheld a finding from the U.S. Copyright Office that a piece of art created by AI is not open to protection. By Winston Cho More than 100 ...

The famous sandal company lost a battle over copyright law, leaving room for imitations ... at least according to the German high court, is a work of art. On Thursday, the federal court of justice ...

Brendan Paul Murphy does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations ...

Grynbaum and Ryan Mac The New York Times sued OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement on Wednesday ... there will be a vacuum that no computer or artificial intelligence can fill ...