Johnson & Johnson is beginning its third legal battle over its baby powder product's alleged link to ovarian cancer in more than 62,000 women across the country in a $10 billion case ...

In this April 15, 2011, file photo, a bottle of Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder is displayed. Johnson & Johnson is asking for Supreme Court review of a $2 billion verdict in favor of women who ...

J&J, which began selling Johnson’s baby powder in 1894, says that its products are safe, do not contain asbestos, and do not cause cancer. J&J stopped selling talc-based baby powder in the US in ...

Johnson & Johnson has denied its products were unsafe, and did not admit fault in the settlement. Recent studies have supported a possible link between the baby powder and cancer.

These talcum powder-containing products — including Johnson's Baby Powder and J&J's Shower to Shower — were sold in New York and across the country for decades.

Johnson & Johnson will pay $175 million per year over the four years, according to court records. Alabama: $13.4 million Alaska: $3.15 million Arizona: $15.4 million Arkansas: $12.7 million ...

Johnson & Johnson is facing a new proposed class action seeking damages and medical monitoring on behalf of women who have been diagnosed with cancer, or might develop it in the future, allegedly ...

The Mesothelioma Center said that Johnson & Johnson has used talcum powder, also known as talc, in its iconic baby powder formula since 1894. And the FDA said that talc is a natural mineral with ...

Johnson & Johnson said Tuesday that 15 new tests of the same bottle of baby powder that had been tested by the FDA found no asbestos. An additional 48 new lab tests of samples from the recalled lot of ...