According to Geekbench scores from Qualcomm, the Snapdragon model scored 2408 on single-core and 14,129 on multi-core, while the Intel model only had 1,250 single-core and 6,760 multi-core.

Intel Looking at our benchmark results, we see that Snapdragon X is a lot faster than Core Ultra Series 2 in CPU-intensive tasks. There’s some variability, but that’s generally true.

Intel Core Ultra (Series 2) debuted with the V-series, which we've already seen plenty of in premium thin-and-light devices like the HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (2024) I reviewed. Series 2 also ...

Intel's flagship "Arrow Lake" CPU, the Core Ultra 9 285K, delivers reduced power consumption, dedicated AI silicon, and promising platform improvements. The one big question mark: Its performance ...

In addition, Intel doesn’t support hyperthreading on its E-cores. Because of that setup, the Core i9-14900K has more cores than the Ryzen 9 9950X, but both CPUs offer the same number of threads.

Many OEMs have PCs powered by Intel Core Ultra Series 2 on the way starting on Sept. 24, 2024, and PCs powered by these chips will be able to update to Copilot+ PCs in November.

The H Series maxes out with fewer threads the HX Series, at just 16 threads total. The Core Ultra 9 285H has six P-cores (Lion Cove), 8 E-cores (Skymont), and 2 Low-power E-cores.

Intel's remembered the gamersSo far, we’ve seen Intel Core Ultra 200V impress in thin and light laptops like the Asus Zenbook S14. And now at CES 2025, Intel is taking it to the next level with ...

Intel’s Core Ultra 9 285K CPU is one step forward, one step back for PC gaming Intel’s flagship Core Ultra 200S-series processor runs more efficiently, but PC gaming performance is disappointing.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K test system I used a fully up to date test system that included Windows 11 24H2, Nvidia driver 566.03. This is installed onto a WD Blue SN5000 SSD with other hardware ...

A lack of F-series Core 9 Ultra CPUs might mean there isn't as much choice for gamers looking for a high-end CPU, but if they've got over $500 to spend on a processor, then a $20-$30 saving isn't ...