There's Intel and AMD on the x86 side, with Apple and Qualcomm making Arm-based processors on the other. We break down the ...

Intel Core Ultra (Series 2) debuted with the V-series, which we've already seen plenty of in premium thin-and-light devices like the HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (2024) I reviewed. Series 2 also ...

The Dell 16 Premium (previously XPS) offers up to a 4K OLED touchscreen, Intel Core Ultra processor, and an RTX 50-Series GPU ...

Intel is allegedly working on a large L3 cache for Nova Lake, something big enough to compete with AMD's 3D-VCache technology ...

Intel's flagship "Arrow Lake" CPU, the Core Ultra 9 285K, delivers reduced power consumption, dedicated AI silicon, and promising platform improvements. The one big question mark: Its performance ...

Intel Looking at our benchmark results, we see that Snapdragon X is a lot faster than Core Ultra Series 2 in CPU-intensive tasks. There’s some variability, but that’s generally true.

The H Series maxes out with fewer threads the HX Series, at just 16 threads total. The Core Ultra 9 285H has six P-cores (Lion Cove), 8 E-cores (Skymont), and 2 Low-power E-cores.

In addition, Intel doesn’t support hyperthreading on its E-cores. Because of that setup, the Core i9-14900K has more cores than the Ryzen 9 9950X, but both CPUs offer the same number of threads.

According to Geekbench scores from Qualcomm, the Snapdragon model scored 2408 on single-core and 14,129 on multi-core, while the Intel model only had 1,250 single-core and 6,760 multi-core.

Intel’s Core Ultra 9 285K CPU is one step forward, one step back for PC gaming Intel’s flagship Core Ultra 200S-series processor runs more efficiently, but PC gaming performance is disappointing.