The Exynos 2200 and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 are also fabricated alike, built using Samsung’s EUV (extreme ultraviolet lithography) process on a 4 nanometer (4nm) node.

For the first time in many years, we have varied competition in the flagship SoC segment. Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is rivaled by Samsung’s Exynos 2200 and MediaTek’s Dimensity 9000.You ...

The Exynos 2200 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chips are capable of recording 4K as well as 8K videos at higher frame rates. The Snapdragon chip supports 4K slow-mo videos at 120fps and 720p at 960fps.

Given how many 8 Gen 1 phones we’ve tested and the range of benchmarks we’ve run, the Exynos 2200 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 results are perhaps a little disappointing. GPU results aside, of course.

When narrowing the focus to the GPU, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 again comes out on top, though the margin is at least closer. In GFXBench 3.1, the Exynos 2200 averaged 141 frames per second compared ...

MediaTek chip clearly outperforms the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and the Exynos 2200 in both multi-core and single-core departments. If you’ve been following the benchmark scene, you probably know that ...

It’s the Exynos 2200 variant of the Galaxy S22 phones that suffered from throttling the most, not the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 model. Still, there’s another reason to cheer for the 8 Plus Gen 1.

Samsung has officially started teasing the Exynos 2400, which may be produced alongside the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the company's foundry. Skip to main content Toggle main menu ...

The Exynos chip scored 8642 FPS as compared to the 8601 FPS of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, it’s a win. even if the margin is smaller. Speaking of power efficiency, the Exynos 2400 consumed around 20 ...

For that price, Samsung’s device will apparently be using a Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 from Qualcomm in the United States rather than the Exynos 2200 chip, which is being used in other regions.